User talk:Miniapolis/Archives/2015/November

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Replied to your query

I replied to you at Talk:Think_of_the_children#UN_Charter_reference, perhaps you could respond, there?

Thank you,

— Cirt (talk) 19:44, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Godwin's law to Godwin's Law

I noticed your capitalization change of Lovejoy's law to Lovejoy's Law.

I did some research, and the correct form should be upscale capitalization, you are totally correct.

Could you please move Godwin's law to Godwin's Law ?

I can't do it, gotta be an admin, due to prior redirects/page moves.

Thank you,

— Cirt (talk) 22:06, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Will do; it makes more sense to capitalize "Law". All the best, Miniapolis 22:36, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Definitely agreed, and there's precedent in related categories. Thank you !!! — Cirt (talk) 03:21, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

Allegra Versace

If you want to, you can take a look at the article about Allegra Versace. That article is this weeks TAFI.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, Babba, but I'm very busy right now. List it at WP:GOCE/REQ; although I work from the top of the list (the oldest articles) other editors, such as Corinne, sometimes copyedit more recent additions. All the best, Miniapolis 00:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

November 2015 newsletter

The WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter
Volume III, no. 3, September–November 2015

Note: To opt out from receiving future newsletters, please click here for instructions.                                      

Project News

  • Potential upcoming project page changes by WikiProject X. Category discussions at CfD. (more below)
— View by clicking [show] —


  • WikiProject X may begin pilot testing to refine WikiProject Food and Drink's project's pages. A recent discussion regarding this occurred at the project talk page here.
  • During September–October 2015, several food and drink categories have been discussed at Categories for discussion. Notices for these discussions are sometimes posted at the project's talk page. Notice about a new discussion was recently posted at the project talk page on 8 November 2015.
  • There are presently 3,658 unassessed Food and drink articles. Assistance in reducing this number would be appreciated.
  • Please see the project's Tasks and To do sections for project and article tasks, and please update the lists by adding new entries and removing resolved or outdated ones.

Article alerts

— View by clicking [show] —

Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink/Article alerts

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Curabitur pretium tincidunt lacus. Nulla gravida orci a odio. Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Integer in mauris eu nibh euismod gravida. Duis ac tellus et risus vulputate vehicula. Donec lobortis risus a elit. Etiam tempor. Ut ullamcorper, ligula eu tempor congue, eros est euismod turpis, id tincidunt sapien risus a quam. Maecenas fermentum consequat mi. Donec fermentum. Pellentesque malesuada nulla a mi. Duis sapien sem, aliquet nec, commodo eget, consequat quis, neque. Aliquam faucibus, elit ut dictum aliquet, felis nisl adipiscing sapien, sed malesuada diam lacus eget erat. Cras mollis scelerisque nunc. Nullam arcu. Aliquam consequat. Curabitur augue lorem, dapibus quis, laoreet et, pretium ac, nisi. Aenean magna nisl, mollis quis, molestie eu, feugiat in, orci. In hac habitasse platea dictumst.

Fusce convallis, mauris imperdiet gravida bibendum, nisl turpis suscipit mauris, sed placerat ipsum urna sed risus. In convallis tellus a mauris. Curabitur non elit ut libero tristique sodales. Mauris a lacus. Donec mattis semper leo. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Vivamus facilisis diam at odio. Mauris dictum, nisi eget consequat elementum, lacus ligula molestie metus, non feugiat orci magna ac sem. Donec turpis. Donec vitae metus. Morbi tristique neque eu mauris. Quisque gravida ipsum non sapien. Proin turpis lacus, scelerisque vitae, elementum at, lobortis ac, quam. Aliquam dictum eleifend risus. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Etiam sit amet diam. Suspendisse odio. Suspendisse nunc. In semper bibendum libero.

Proin nonummy, lacus eget pulvinar lacinia, pede felis dignissim leo, vitae tristique magna lacus sit amet eros. Nullam ornare. Praesent odio ligula, dapibus sed, tincidunt eget, dictum ac, nibh. Nam quis lacus. Nunc eleifend molestie velit. Morbi lobortis quam eu velit. Donec euismod vestibulum massa. Donec non lectus. Aliquam commodo lacus sit amet nulla. Cras dignissim elit et augue. Nullam non diam. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Aenean vestibulum. Sed lobortis elit quis lectus. Nunc sed lacus at augue bibendum dapibus.
  • Feel free to welcome the new members who have recently joined the project.
— View by clicking [show] —
Onel5969
Valoem
DangerousJXD
The project currently has 83 active members.
— View by clicking [show] —


Past newsletters

Food and drink articles by quality and importance

— View by clicking [show] —
Article statistics
Food and Drink WikiProject
article assessment
Food and drink articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 7 13 28 48
FL 2 1 3
FM 139 139
A 1 1
GA 13 24 73 251 5 366
B 55 235 331 584 67 1,272
C 81 389 960 2,733 468 4,631
Start 22 322 1,640 9,879 5 3,794 15,662
Stub 17 558 7,842 5,035 13,452
List 11 69 110 468 23 271 952
Category 9 1 7,642 7,652
Disambig 157 157
File 2,996 2,996
Portal 614 614
Project 384 384
Redirect 10 71 542 2,685 3,308
Template 948 948
Other 4 191 195
Assessed 183 1,084 3,757 22,332 15,784 9,640 52,780
Unassessed 20 1 2,011 2,032
Total 183 1,084 3,757 22,352 15,785 11,651 54,812
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 182,081 Ω = 5.14

  – Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 23:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

Edit

doesn't work, markup inside <!-- --> tags won't render substitute. NE Ent 22:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC) NE Ent 23:26, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

It's not supposed to; my signature and timestamp are supposed to be hidden here. Miniapolis 23:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, wrong word; four squiggles in a comment are just four squiggles.NE Ent 23:26, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks; I'll replace it with {{hes}}. Miniapolis 23:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Belgium national football team

I kindly beg you to stop making edits the way you are doing it now. Here and there you make good suggestions for alternative ways of writing a sentence, but too many times you change deliberately chosen words and facts. More careful copy-editing is required. Thanks for the attempts, though. Regards, Kareldorado (talk) 21:11, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

I'm copyediting the article (or was) according to the Manual of Style; however, if you're dissatisfied with my work I'll move on. There's a reason that article is the oldest one on WP:GOCE/REQ; it's long, and while the prose is pretty good it was apparently written by a non-native English speaker (which was implied in the GA review). Sounds like you need another copyeditor, and good luck with FA (where the reviewers are quite picky about prose). Miniapolis 22:14, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Hi Miniapolis, after a brief glance I thought your edits improved the article's prose and the requester could easily have corrected minor points like "biennial" to "biannual" (an oversight I'm sure) without reverting the whole shebang. I'll take the request and I'll see how we go. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 22:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
I cannot tell a lie; I changed "biannual" to "biennial" because I thought it was a normality-normalcy thing, but I'm more familiar with American English and after checking my dictionary (which I do frequently when copyediting) I see both are correct. Thanks for taking it on, Baffle, and I hope you do better; the GA review suggested a copyedit, but I sometimes come across editors who take them personally. Glad you're back, and hope you enjoyed your wikibreak. All the best, Miniapolis 22:55, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, I had an enjoyable week away from all things internet-related. The prose in this article seems awkwardly-written and it's easy to misinterpret unclear text; I'm two paras in and I've already scratched my head. Hopefully there aren't too many stumbling blocks here. I've asked that you're credited as co-c/e in the archives anyway. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:31, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Please don't bother about the credit; I don't care about that, and if you see it through you'll have done most of the work anyway. It's good to get away from the net; when I'm away, I don't miss it :-). Glad you had fun. Thanks again and all the best, Miniapolis 23:37, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Miniapolis, I am sorry for the rude reverting of the entire 'shabang'. This was no personal offense. I was relatively short in time and want to give a more detailed comment: several things you proposed are worth reconciliation - and I thank you for these - , many a couple not. I should check one by one which to keep and which not. Kareldorado (talk) 06:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
By the way, the article is of a perfect size (see the Wikipedia page on article size), and I don't bother that it kept longer to find copyeditors to take a look at it. Kareldorado (talk) 06:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
True, I ain't native English speaker, but there are several things that I do incorporate on purpose or not. I avoid the regular use of "-ing", try to vary in word usage,... Kareldorado (talk) 06:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
That's okay, although it took you much less time to revert my edits than it took me to make them. Baffle gab1978, an excellent copyeditor, is working on the article now; keep in mind that there was a reason the GA reviewer recommended a copyedit, and I figure that's the only reason it ended up on WP:GOCE/REQ. I don't know how much experience you have with the FAC process, but an absolute (although unwritten) requirement is the flexibility to make changes as needed during the review process—even if you disagree with them. What I don't understand is why a non-native English speaker would second-guess a native speaker. Anyway, good luck and all the best. Miniapolis 13:25, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Once again: sorry for the radical reverts - I am grateful for the effort you did and do plan to incorporate some suggestions you made, they were not in vain. Know that I perfectly agree that this article needed to be taken to GOCE! I was mostly bothered by Toby Alderweireld's description as 'striker', the change between 'biannually' and 'biennially' and the drastic changes in the descriptions under the figures that could barely be better. Many of the textual changes you made were a lot better. I am busy IRL but soon or later will implement some of your suggestions with thanks to your work this week. Regards, Kareldorado (talk) 20:00, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Baffle, with some deep shame I have to admit I overreacted since most of Miniapolis' edits were helpful indeed. The little time I had at that moment and the view of a couple of (unintentional) changes in content made me flip out, but now I re-integrate most of his edits. You too, thanks for the bright copyediting. Wikipedia indeed needs native English speakers to get optimally smooth texts. Keep up the good work! Cheers, Kareldorado (talk) 20:23, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I've implemented most of your changes now; they greatly improved the article's readability (clearness and conciseness). Be my guest to adapt the other sections. Kareldorado (talk) 08:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, but I'm working on other articles. Good luck and all the best, Miniapolis 13:15, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Ok, thanks anyway. Cheers, Kareldorado (talk) 08:33, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I just nominated Belgium national football team as featured article candidate, which probably would not have been the case yet without the prose improvements you provided. You can follow the review process here, leave comments whenever you like. Regards, Kareldorado (talk) 11:16, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. Good luck and all the best, Miniapolis 14:20, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

A barnstar for you!

The Copyeditor's Barnstar
Thank you, Miniapolis, for your copy-editing help at Think of the children.

Much appreciated. :) — Cirt (talk) 03:28, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Glad to help; I always enjoy your articles. Good luck and all the best, Miniapolis 14:59, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Isaac Folorunso Adewole

Hi Miniapolis,

How are you doing today? I trust you are doing fine. Could you please help with copy editing on the above article? Thanks in anticipation. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 12:48, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, but as you see on the top of this page I don't copyedit on demand because it's ... well, too demanding :-). List it on the Guild of Copy Editors request page and you'll get a good copyedit, from me or someone else. All the best, Miniapolis 01:58, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Miniapolis/Archives/2015/November&oldid=697265424"