Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Aqua Teen Hunger Force episodes/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 22:23, 11 November 2011 [1].
List of Aqua Teen Hunger Force episodes[edit]
List of Aqua Teen Hunger Force episodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Grapesoda22 (talk) 04:16, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I believe it meats the proper requirements to become a featured list. I am willing to make all necessary changes if it doesn't. Grapesoda22 (talk) 04:16, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comments - oh, this is not a brilliant start I'm afraid...
- WP:MOS fails...
- En-dashes (see WP:DASH) needed for year ranges and volume ranges and to avoid spaced hyphens in the reference titles.
- WP:CAPTION – that's not a complete sentence so no period required.
- MOS:NUM – naughty mixed date formats in the references.
- MOS:BOLD – no bold links and no need to bold random things like the number of episodes.
- WP:LEAD – don't really need five paras in the lead for an article of this length.
- The Tv.com link doesn't tell me much.
- Not convinced Twitter is a reliable source.
- Where are production codes referenced?
The Rambling Man (talk) 18:02, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The dashes were fixed. I un-bolded the number count, removed the period from the image's caption. Trimmed the opening, including the sentences the TV.com link was vague about. and cleaned up the "Season 9: 2012" section. Wasn't sure what to do about ref dates. And production codes are found in each episode's page on TV.com. Grapesoda22 (talk) 22:25, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The Prod code for season 8 is wrong. should be 80x not 100x according to the ref. And about the refs, you should pick one format. ie, either 10 October 2011, October 10, 2011 or 2011-10-10. not all three. and always use accessdate= to all those cites and date= aswell if it includes date in the ref it self. In addition, I would ref each Prod. code from the Overview page as needed. (Yes there 100 but still needed, same as other articles/lists I seen).
– HonorTheKing (talk) 23:57, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not entirely sure if TV.com got the season 8 prod. codes are right. The Adult Swim video schedule, which sometimes goes by prod. codes, claims that the prod codes for season 8 are 100X. Also instead of using TV.com I found IGN features the production code in the list of episodes in each individual season. Grapesoda22 (talk) 02:35, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (27 and counting) 23:18, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
- Bold links like the one at the start are discouraged in the MoS.
- Another semi-colon that should be a comma, after "premiered in theatres" in the last paragraph of the lead.
- IMDB (refs 3, 4, and 9) isn't the most reliable website in the world. Since it seems to be sourcing basic information, are better replacements possible? Giants2008 (27 and counting) 23:18, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
First two done. More specific IMDB liked used instead of refs 3+4Grapesoda22 (talk) 01:05, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm with drawing this nomination. At least for the time being. Grapesoda22 (talk) 01:45, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.