User talk:Vicstasiuk7

Welcome![edit]

Hi Vicstasiuk7! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Ursusvenandi (talk) 17:12, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit[edit]

Hello, thanks for your edit to Alex Klein, but I've had to undo it per my edit summary. Not only are infoboxes a hot-button issue on classical music articles, the English Wikipedia has a highly fraught relationship with Wikidata due to questions about its reliability and its vulnerability to vandalism. The discussions linked from Wikipedia:Wikidata and Template talk:Infobox person/Wikidata give a taste of this, but make heavy reading even for experienced Wikipedia editors. As a new user I would avoid using templates like {{Infobox person/Wikidata}} without a specific reason. If a particular person told you that using Wikidata in this way was a good idea, I would appreciate it if you let them know about this message.

However on the bright side, your edit did alert me to an accessibility problem in {{Uses Wikidata}}, which I've fixed. Graham87 04:42, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Vicstasiuk7/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Vicstasiuk7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Vicstasiuk7/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wiki-Wednesdays Canada/Canadian Visual Artists[edit]

Hello Vicstasiuk7,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Wiki-Wednesdays Canada/Canadian Visual Artists for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang (talk) 00:08, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vicstasiuk7,

It was a big mistake for you to put this page into the main space of the project. This is an event page, not an article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:03, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: As a WP:ATD should this be transwikified or moved to user space? Thanks. VickKiang (talk) 02:17, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the page as it was one big huge advertisement which does not belong in article space. It can be restored to a subpage in your user space if you wish. -- Whpq (talk) 03:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to change the content to be more similar to the group of University Librarians and have been helping me.

This is my first event - I am being assisted by NavinoEvans, Erniee jo, and EmilyCJ.

Once I do this, I would like to be able to post a meetup pase similar to this one - Wikipedia:Meetup/Western University/1Lib1Ref 2020 - Wikipedia Vicstasiuk7 (talk) 11:13, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wikipedia:Meetup/Canada WikiWednesdays/Canadian Visual Artists[edit]

Hello, Vicstasiuk7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wikipedia:Meetup/Canada WikiWednesdays/Canadian Visual Artists, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wikipedia:Meetup/Canada WikiWednesdays/Canadian Visual Artists[edit]

Hello, Vicstasiuk7. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Canada WikiWednesdays/Canadian Visual Artists".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Liz,

Thanks for updating me regarding the status of this Meetup page. We have been informed of a successful grant submission to continue this work until February 2024 from the Wikimedia Foundation (General Support).

I have sent a request for it to be undeleted this morning.

Victoria Vicstasiuk7 (talk) 13:35, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wikipedia:Meetup/Canada WikiWednesdays/Canadian Visual Artists[edit]

Hello, Vicstasiuk7. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Canada WikiWednesdays/Canadian Visual Artists".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:44, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tracey-Mae Chambers (February 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tracey-Mae Chambers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 20:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vicstasiuk7! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 20:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Thank you for letting me know so quickly.

I am working on a project for visual artists in Canada to help them with wikidata and wikipedia.

We were trying to draft an article to show our over 45 registrants coming to our webinar for this Wednesday.

If you can help us before that it would great.

I am working with several other contributors on this project.

@NavinoEvans @Natharchives Vicstasiuk7 (talk) 20:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tracey-Mae Chambers (February 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not meet the notability guidelines for artists. The Douglas Family Art Centre piece is a profile provided by the artist and Ingenium Channel is an interview so primary sources and not independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tracey-Mae Chambers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vicstasiuk7 I added some sources, see last paragraph of the draft. What you want to look for are galleries or museums where she has exhibited that have articles about them so I added sources for Galt Museum & Archives, McMaster Museum of Art and Rideau Hall. What would be very helpful is at least one critical review of her work from a recognized art critic. Everything I have found are interviews with her with no critical commentary. S0091 (talk) 17:06, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for helping us! Vicstasiuk7 (talk) 17:59, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tracey-Mae Chambers (February 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CoconutOctopus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article has not been improved since last submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tracey-Mae Chambers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CoconutOctopus talk 20:56, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Next Toronto WikiClub meetup[edit]

Thanks again for attending the last Toronto WikiClub in January! If you want to help plan the next meeting, please add your name in the designated section of the WikiClub page. Please do not worry if you are not interested in the organizing aspect. We will keep everyone informed once the meetup is scheduled through the WikiClub page. SophieWMCA (talk) 17:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]