User talk:Thisissparta12345

November 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Using talk pages as a forum for your personal opinions; this seems to be the sole purpose of your account.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thisissparta12345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I did not use the talk page of the 31 October 2023 attack on Jabalia as a forum for my personal opinions. I tried to remain as factual as possible: I stated that all the big news networks - CNN, BBC, etc. - were quoted saying that at least 50 people died in the airstrike. The article's infobox said that the amount of casualties was "100+ killed", which is contradictory to what is stated in said news networks. Furthermore, I stated that on the project page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources, it specifically says that some editors believe that Al Jazeera is not a reliable source when it comes to news regarding the Israeli-Arab conflict. I did not state my personal opinion, and I am sorry if it was interpreted as such. I'll do my best to sound as factual as possible, so please unblock me from editing.

Decline reason:

"The US Intelligence services are professional. As opposed to those of dictatorships (such as the Arab countries), they are obliged under American law to report their findings without bias - as they serve a democracy." Block is correct. Yamla (talk) 22:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thisissparta12345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The above quote of mine is completely factual - According to the English Wikipedia, all Arab countries are dictatorships. And According to the English Wikipedia, The US is a democracy. There is no expression of personal opinion here.

Decline reason:

Then you should find it quite simple to come up with a reliable source (Wikipedia is not one) for this sentence. Where does the "US intelligence services are professional" and its conclusion come from? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thisissparta12345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did NOT promote my point of view - every statement I made was backed by the English Wikipedia article pertaining to each statement. For example, I said that all Arab countries are dictatorships - the English Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Economist_Democracy_Index confirms this.

Decline reason:

But, that is not the reason for your block (using Wikipedia as a source). You were blocked for using Wikipedia to promote your point of view. The block seams correct. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:07, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A reply to the previous topic I added[edit]

I request a reply. Thisissparta12345 (talk) 19:39, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]