User talk:The MK

WikiProject Yemen[edit]

Merhaba and Welcome to WikiProject Yemen. We are happy that you joined us. If you have any questions, need help on something, or suggestions, then please don't hesitate to tell us. To identify yourself as a member of this project, you can add this template to your user page:

{{User WikiProject Yemen}}

Cheers, Abo Yemen ✉ 09:11, 12 February 2024‎ (UTC)[reply]

Azd[edit]

Hi, I've undid your edits in the Azd page, please discuss your conflicting opinion here so we could come to consensus. Regards, DrunkenBedouin

May 2024[edit]

Your recent editing history at Azd shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Adam Black ^{t • c} 11:39, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well thanks for informing me about this, I agree to not knowing the three-revert rule, now I know it, and will follow it, but the reason why I kept reverting (will not do it again), is because during the discussion between me and the other party, that user kept changing it back and hence I changed it back to it’s original form before the discussion commenced. |MK| 📝 11:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no, it was highly inconsiderate of you for having flooded the revision history to such an extent. This wasn't an urgent matter (like defacement, defamation, etc.). Both of you reverting back and forth takes the entire screen of the revision history. Please use an applicable dispute resolution request next time. Thank you. El_C 12:08, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replying to your note and to your response to my unblock request, I didn’t see your note and that’s why I put a unblock request, if I had seen it I would’ve responded and not bothered with the request, and also I didn’t know about the three-revert rule, but when I knew when I was informed about it and knew my mistake, I submitted an unblock request explaining my actions. About the note, I agree with what you said, and again, I did not know about the three-revert rule while reverting, now I know and will stick to three reverts a day, that is if I ever needed those three reverts at any given day. |MK| 📝 12:25, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Say I unblocked you, what would your intent for that article be for the immediate moment? El_C 12:45, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing, I would just continue discussing in the talk page. |MK| 📝 12:47, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well you can do that now. Neither one of you is blocked from the talk page, that will always be expressly noted. El_C 12:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Partial block[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing Azd for violation of the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. El_C 11:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock from Azd request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The MK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well I did violate the three-revert rule, but it wasent to disrupt anything, me and another user, DrunkenBedouin, were involved in a discussion about my changes, where during the discussion in Talk: Azd DrunkenBedouin kept reverting the changes that we were discussing before reaching an understanding or a consensus, which, if i’m not wrong, is not allowed |MK| 📝 12:09, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Looks to me like the block from that one article is helpful to Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:27, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I guess you're not gonna bother replying to my note to you above...? Oh well. Also, how do you claim to not know the rules, but at the same time also claim to know the rules? Does not align. El_C 12:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]