User talk:Pyeongchang

No need to keep justifying a heading

I notice you often add an edit summary like "Give sport its own heading as most place articles have". Nobody is likely to object to a widely-used heading being added to an article or a large subsection being promoted to a top-level section. The reason you may find sport as a sub-section (or not having any section) is due to the way that Wikipedia articles grow over time. So it may be that someone adds the first piece of sporting information in a list of amenites e.g. "Smallville has a pub, a post office, and a football club" (which would not justify a Sport heading). And then someone writes a bit more about football club and so on. Eventually, someone thinks "this article has enough content about sport for a sub-heading or heading" and reorganises the conent to add that heading. It's just the natural evolutionary process of Wikipedia, which you don't really need to explain. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me. Kerry (talk) 01:42, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Many thanks for the advice. Pyeongchang (talk) 13:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Pyeongchang. Thank you for your work on Hinksey Sculling School. Another editor, Rosguill, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

It still falls short of WP:ORGCRITE as written, but I was able to find more detailed secondary sources ([1], [2]) online that do establish notability.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

@Rosguill: Many thanks for your research Rosguill, I will have a look at them and add them.