User talk:Mimon

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. semper fictilis 21:23, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. If you are correct, you'll surely be able to cite some scholarly source that makes the same point. semper fictilis 21:33, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks again for your message. Sorry, the source that you've cited from the perseus project does not support your point. Akhilleus is correct here. semper fictilis 21:49, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule on Minoan civilization. In the future, please solve editing disputes through discussion rather than edit warring. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Heimstern Läufer (talk) 22:48, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mimon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Of course, my blocking is unfair, i have cited referenced, scholarly material from the perseus project, and Akhilleus keeps on deleting them, he keeps on accusing me of raising points or assuming that i am someone else, when in fact i have raised no points, nor i support a specific argument as the History of the article testifies in the most blatant manner. I have only inserted 2 referenced, accurate, concise, and sourced material from a very reliable and valid source. Nothing more, nothing less.

Decline reason:

This appears to be a simple content dispute. The three revert rule was apparently presented to you several times before your block. Please read said policy, and then continue to resolve your dispute on the article's talk page. Kuru ^talk 23:32, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.