User talk:FGWQPR

Archives

April 2008[edit]

"Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to St George's Day, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. FGWQPR (talk) 15:08, 23 April 2008 (UTC)"

This simply isn't the case. I noticed someone had written non-sense, deflamatory comments on the page. I simply removed them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.222.116.232 (talk) 10:38, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please make new comments at the end of the page and sign your comments on talk pages by using four tildes- ~ (talk) 19:39, 28 April 2008 (UTC)].--FGWQPR (talk) 19:39, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With regard to your comments on User:Islander: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 15:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at Talk:First Great Western, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. _Talk Islander 17:18, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well you made a personal attack on me The Islander so you can speak up for yourself.--FGWQPR (talk) 17:27, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I said that WP:COI may apply. Hardly a personal attack. _Talk Islander 17:22, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Corection you said seing as the companies name and PR appear in your name, meaning you thought and made other people think I worked for FGW failing to notice the Q of QPR forming FGW and QPR. --FGWQPR (talk) 17:27, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, this is really my last warning: cool off. If you don't, I will force a cool off period of an hour or two by blocking you m'kay? You really are blowing things out of all proportion, and it's unecessary and disruptive. Last chance: replace those innaccurate warnings, and I will block you. _Talk Islander 17:36, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, soon as you do that I remove all of my edits ever, the FGW page will be a wreck beleive me. --FGWQPR (talk) 17:38, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. 76

. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:40, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Came here to help[edit]

Hi just wanted to let you know that I came to try and help you make the First Great Western article better. Do you think that we could have constructive conversation about improving that article without some of the "drama" displayed previously between you and other editors? If so I'd be happy to try and help. Jasynnash2 (talk) 15:27, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, of course, I would certainly like to avoid a repeat.

I've replied to your post on my talkpage. Also, please do not blank sections of my talkpage, and I won't blank sections of yours. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 15:58, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages[edit]

FGW- Please do not erase parts of a talk page. It doesn't matter what you feel about the conversations contained, just don't erase it. It's belong there, and it should stay there. Noble Story (talk) 03:13, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is my talkpage and I will erase what I like.--FGWQPR (talk) 06:56, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What you do with your talkpage, I don't care. But I'm talking about the First Great Western talk page. Noble Story (talk) 08:13, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sorry.--FGWQPR (talk) 14:47, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editor Review[edit]

Would you like for me to comment on your editor review as well? Dusti^{speak and be heard!} 17:42, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please. --FGWQPR (talk) 18:51, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption[edit]

I also accept. We will begin now if you wish. Also, you can add {{Adoptee|Dustihowe}} to your userboxes. Please realize, my email is enabled, however, I rarely check it. Dusti^{complain/compliment} 19:49, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I am going offline now, so shall we start tommorow.

Please visit this page. Thanks, Dusti^{complain/compliment} 15:49, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FGWQPR, I'd like to make a comment on your adoption page. I promise it's civil, but I do have a question. Am I welcome to post there, or would you prefer I post here? You have every right to say no, (just don't say f-off :-) :-).... Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:03, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and post it on the adoption page Keeper...Dusti ^{complain/compliment} 17:04, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I asked FGWQPR! I'll wait for him to agree. :-) Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:05, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok....I'm not sure he's online right now...Dusti ^{complain/compliment} 17:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was eating but am online now. Please do post on my adoption page.--FGWQPR (talk) 17:16, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...[edit]

Thanks for your support with Britishrailclass191 (or whatever he was called). He has now decided to leave Wiki, but I suspect he will be back! Btline (talk) 19:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Profuse Apologies[edit]

For my personal attack. I really did not mean this, I have deleted by useless comments from this page as I feel they were misguided. I hope we can sort this situation out. Thanks and Regards Britishrailclass91 (talk) 16:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Accepted, move on. Your comments will be archived in my archive.--FGWQPR (talk) 21:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IP Address Problems[edit]

Hi, sorry if I wrongly reverted your edits, it appears it was not me who reverted it, I am very sorry. If you like contributing to Wikipedia why not sign up for account it is quick and easy.--FGWQPR (talk) 19:43, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your 1st AFD[edit]

Remember this? Just thought you would want to see the turn of events and how you've got to be careful when nominating an article for deletion. Dusti^{complain/compliment} 18:49, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's rather harsh isn't it Dusti? It at least sounds harsh. If I remember correctly, FGWQPR nommed Incheol shin for AFD, you then added a db-bio tag for a speedy delete to the article yourself. It was speedy deleted (by me), and then User:Eastmain rescued it from my deletion happy grasps. Hardly fair to say "FGWQPR" failed. Nobody "failed" anything. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 18:54, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taken out of context. I was letting him see the turn of events, I've changed the title so it doesn't seem harsh. I've had speedies declined. FGWQPR, no you didn't fail, you learned. I learned from this as well. Actually, a lot of people learned from it. Guess I need to watch my wording huh? Dusti^{complain/compliment} 18:57, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was keeping an eye on it anyway but thank you. --FGWQPR (talk) 20:54, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption offer[edit]

I've had a look over your adoption page and I see that you've been making some solid gains. I would like to offer to take up the torch - though I should warn that I am typically only quite active during "business hours" in the Eastern time zone (this message being an exception - I can't sleep ;>) - though I do poke my head in here and there in the evenings. If you would prefer an adopter who is more active during your editing times, simply let me know and re-add the adoption request to your userpage, otherwise, if you'd like to go ahead with it we can get started. xenocidic (talk) 07:23, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your offer and I very happily accept. Just leave messages when youre on and I will complete them when I am on. --FGWQPR (talk) 15:04, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Would you prefer to keep the exchanges in User:FGWQPR/adoption or here? And do you want me to provide tasks the way Dusti was doing, or do you just want me to answer questions and such? xenocidic (talk) 15:18, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes and I would like it to be the same as before with tasks and I will ask questions if I need help. Many thanks. --FGWQPR (talk) 17:04, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated your adoption page. xenocidic (talk) 18:50, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for all that has happened latley. I see that you have been readopted. Lemme know if you need anything. Dusti^{complain/compliment} 17:25, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if you would be ok with being your co-adopter? Since we started out, I thought it would be a little easier for you if you had two editors to go to, rather than one. Plus your my first adoptee so I'm kinda jealous j/k :D. Lemme know! Dusti^{complain/compliment} 12:47, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned here, I've no problem having Dusti come back on as co-adopter. xenocidic (talk) 12:59, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is a brilliant idea.--FGWQPR (talk) 19:53, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check In[edit]

Just wanted to check in and see how things are going. Ping me on my talk page. Just hit SPEAK!!! over there to your left. :) Dusti^SPEAK!! 00:29, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

classroom portion of your adoption now available![edit]

File:FGW150 CloseUp.JPG listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FGW150 CloseUp.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:53, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]