User talk:Cleaner880

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Cleaner880, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 07:17, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant peacockery, and disruptive editings, August 2017[edit]

Hello, I have reverted your edits on the article Woman and Crown (headgear)‎. Your insistence on pushing this image

and adding irrelevant subsection of "style" despite the article already contain similar subsection, in crown article is irrelevant and not a positive contribution to the article. I think your edits is not constructive and serve nothing but peacockery to include and "promote" Philippines in such undue way. Plus, you have persistently undo my edits that can be considered WP:Disruptive editing. Considering the same modus operandi on pushing images and certain irrelevant editings that bordering peacockery to include Philippines in somewhat irrelevant subjects, that is kind of reminds me of the actions of past editors. I suspected you are the sockpuppet of User:JournalmanManila User:Theseeker2016 and User:Jasper0070. WP:SOCK is a serious offence here in wikipedia community. Care to response and explain? — Gunkarta talk 08:52, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why you accusing a person WP:SOCK by just to gain favor as i look on it they are banned editors accusing me of it is against WP:AGF and you removed source statements is against WP:VERIFIABILITY because of this i can also charge you with WP:Disruptive editing (Cleaner880 (talk) 09:10, 5 August 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Since your action and attitude is similar to User:Jasper0070 and User:JournalmanManila and you have retrieve and support Jasper's edits. Your action to include and "promote" Philippines in many articles, despite it was undue, irrelevant and not constructive, is kind of disruptive. It serve nothing but peacockery I presume. I will ask administrator to investigate this, thank you. — Gunkarta talk 09:38, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

well good luck i can defend my Self, no personal Lyndon, and you have the same style of revering infos on philippine article but Lyndobaines are far more Ridiculous following filipino/other users who adding infos to Philippines to revert things and troll using IP's you cannot accuse me because of shared ideas and the ODD thing indonesians are the more feirce editors and hostile to Ph Articles User:Gunkarta (Cleaner880 (talk) 09:45, 5 August 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Reverting as sourced statements is Ridiculously Violating the WP:VERIFIABILITY and your edits are desperately need to be revert.Im not a Filipino but i just observed what you doing is not good you overpowering it any agendas? (Cleaner880 :::(talk) 10:16, 5 August 2017 (UTC))[reply]

this is not good see this [1] (Cleaner880 (talk))

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of JournalmanManila (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GAB^gab 00:57, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]