User talk:216.189.201.221

September 2023[edit]

Please stop removing commenting text from The Daily Beast. If you are unhappy with the text, please go to the talk page of the article and discuss it.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:30, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unhappy, just removing this invisible comment as it goes against Wikipedia's NPOV Policies. This comment would likely prevent someone with reliable source, per WP:RSP, from making a change. It is an example of biased stonewalling. 216.189.201.221 (talk) 03:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pls start the talk page discussion rather than continue edit-warring. Ymblanter (talk) 11:58, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did, referencing a Wikipedia approved source. I am making a revision based on that source. You are the one edit warring. 216.189.201.221 (talk) 18:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. Pls read WP:BRD. Ymblanter (talk) 18:32, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which part? 216.189.201.221 (talk) 18:33, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You obviously have problems with D. Ymblanter (talk) 20:20, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussing? Okay, so let’s discuss. 76.76.8.88 (talk) 05:34, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning[edit]

Your recent editing history at The Daily Beast shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —Locke Cole • t • c 04:46, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.