User:JMF/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flush this page[edit]

Inappropriate category challenges[edit]

Category:Political terminology Category:Linguistic controversies

replaced category per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 June 9#Category:Political correctness


span style="font-family[edit]

  • {{keypress}}: © © C
  • {{char}}: © cC © cC
  • Original char: © cC
  • {{code}}: © cC © cC is monospaced so a squeezed oval
  • {{samp}}: © the © the is also monospaced
    with font var: © the
  • {{para}}: |© the= |© the=
  • Unicode: U+00A9 © COPYRIGHT SIGN (©, ©)
  • © cC serif ⚕ : (span style serif)
  • © cC sans-serif ⚕ : (span style sans-serif)
  • Mono: U – U U
  • Arial: Ç ç Ḉ ḉ Ḑ ḑ Ȩ ȩ Ḝ ḝ Ģ ģ Ḩ ḩ Ķ ķ Ļ ļ Ņ ņ P Ŗ ŗ Ş ş Ţ ţ : (span style Arial)
  • Times New Roman: Ç ç Ḉ ḉ Ḑ ḑ Ȩ ȩ Ḝ ḝ Ģ ģ Ḩ ḩ Ķ ķ Ļ ļ Ņ ņ P Ŗ ŗ Ş ş Ţ ţ (span style Times New Roman)
  • Garamond: Ç ç Ḉ ḉ Ḑ ḑ Ȩ ȩ Ḝ ḝ Ģ ģ Ḩ ḩ Ķ ķ Ļ ļ Ņ ņ P Ŗ ŗ Ş ş Ţ ţ (span style Garamond)
  • Courier New: Ç ç Ḉ ḉ Ḑ ḑ Ȩ ȩ Ḝ ḝ Ģ ģ Ḩ ḩ Ķ ķ Ļ ļ Ņ ņ P Ŗ ŗ Ş ş Ţ ţ (span style Courier New)
  • Noto: Ç ç Ḉ ḉ Ḑ ḑ Ȩ ȩ Ḝ ḝ Ģ ģ Ḩ ḩ Ķ ķ Ļ ļ Ņ ņ P Ŗ ŗ Ş ş Ţ ţ : (span style Noto)
  • Verdana: Ç ç Ḉ ḉ Ḑ ḑ Ȩ ȩ Ḝ ḝ Ģ ģ Ḩ ḩ Ķ ķ Ļ ļ Ņ ņ P Ŗ ŗ Ş ş Ţ ţ : (span style Verdana)
  • Trebuchet MS: Ç ç Ḉ ḉ Ḑ ḑ Ȩ ȩ Ḝ ḝ Ģ ģ Ḩ ḩ Ķ ķ Ļ ļ Ņ ņ P Ŗ ŗ Ş ş Ţ ţ : (span style Trebuchet MS)
  • Georgia: Ç ç Ḉ ḉ Ḑ ḑ Ȩ ȩ Ḝ ḝ Ģ ģ Ḩ ḩ Ķ ķ Ļ ļ Ņ ņ P Ŗ ŗ Ş ş Ţ ţ : (span style Georgia)


U+01D11E 𝄞 MUSICAL SYMBOL G CLEF

XT[edit]

x

auc[edit]

Why did I want to cite this?[edit]

Artistic canon?

Diffs[edit]

s:Institutes of the Laws of England wikisource

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AReliable_sources%2FPerennial_sources&type=revision&diff=983827787&oldid=983690192 {{Diff|page|diff|oldid|label}}

with this diff, xyz

this diff

{{Copied |from=Circular reporting |from_oldid=1043025893 |to=Circular reference |date= 8 September 2021 |to_diff= 1043111084&|to_oldid=1031982704 }}

Parishes[edit]

parish.[1]

References

  1. ^ "Contact your Parish, Town or Community Council". Milton Keynes Council. Retrieved 10 October 2020.

Circumflex[edit]

Gramadeg y Gymraeg", by Peter Wynn Thomas, University of Wales Press, 1996 edition, Appendix IV, sections 18 and 37-41

Temp[edit]

birkhauser.ch HTTPS links HTTP links

UK Census (2001). "Local Area Report – Akeley (11UB003)". Nomis. Office for National Statistics.

littlefish.co.uk HTTPS links HTTP links

yᷤ 𝔶ᷤ

Bringurst on typography[edit]

Bringhurst, Robert (2004). The elements of typographic style (third ed.). Seattle: Hartley & Marks. ISBN 978-0-88179-206-5. Denunciation of unspaced mdash is on page 80

See also[edit]

Snowflake[edit]

  • U+2744 SNOWFLAKE and more.
  • U+2B65 UP DOWN TRIANGLE-HEADED ARROW
  • U+2B0D UP DOWN BLACK ARROW

Neoclassical facial canons of Farkas et al[edit]

sometime maybe

Type games[edit]

  • 𝕁𝕠𝕙𝕟 𝕄𝕒𝕪𝕟𝕒𝕣𝕕 𝔽𝕣𝕚𝕖𝕕𝕞𝕒𝕟
  • span style="font-family: monospace; font-size: larger" blah blah

Work in progress[edit]

Listed buildings etc[edit]

Climate[edit]

all done


Climate data for Woburn 1991–2020
Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year
Mean daily maximum °C (°F) 7.4
(45.3)
8.0
(46.4)
10.6
(51.1)
13.8
(56.8)
17.0
(62.6)
20.0
(68.0)
22.4
(72.3)
22.1
(71.8)
19.0
(66.2)
14.7
(58.5)
10.3
(50.5)
7.7
(45.9)
14.4
(57.9)
Mean daily minimum °C (°F) 1.6
(34.9)
1.5
(34.7)
2.7
(36.9)
4.1
(39.4)
6.8
(44.2)
9.8
(49.6)
11.9
(53.4)
12.0
(53.6)
9.8
(49.6)
7.3
(45.1)
4.1
(39.4)
1.8
(35.2)
6.1
(43.0)
Average precipitation mm (inches) 55.4
(2.18)
44.6
(1.76)
39.6
(1.56)
48.3
(1.90)
51.9
(2.04)
54.2
(2.13)
51.2
(2.02)
58.6
(2.31)
55.4
(2.18)
70.7
(2.78)
64.5
(2.54)
58.2
(2.29)
655.3
(25.80)
Mean monthly sunshine hours 53.0 72.3 114.9 152.2 191.5 185.7 198.4 185.3 141.6 104.5 62.0 48.3 1,509.4
Source: Met Office[1]

References

  1. ^ "Woburn 1981–2010 averages". Met Office. Retrieved 11 February 2024.

Dates[edit]

  • {{today}} 15 May 2024
  • {{extract}} 15 May 2024
    • 2460446 julian day number
    • julianday
    • 2 May 2024 Today's date in the Julian calendar

Test area[edit]


Questions parked in a lay-by, pending developments[edit]

Fractional people are somewhat disturbing. Is there a cleverer way to express this:

Even at three or four people per square metre (0.28 or 0.37/sq ft) the risk is low; however at densities of five per square metre (0.46/sq ft) the possibilities for individuals to move become limited, while at higher densities (six to seven per square metre (0.56 to 0.65/sq ft)) individuals become pressed against each other, and can be unable to move of their own volition.

Another editor has hand-crafted the 4 to 5/sq m case as (about 2.5 square feet per person

Reading RDT?[edit]

File:Bere Alston, Reading & Wokingham RJD

Follow up[edit]


Letters as letters, symbols as symbols[edit]

At the risk of mission creep, IMO we should make clear that the directive to use italics does not apply to the case of "letters as letters" or "symbols as symbols". In the latter case especially, the italic form may change the shape of the glyph confusingly or may not even exist at all.

For "letters as letters" or "symbols as symbols", do not use italic, bold or quotation marks. To set a letter off from surrounding text, use template:angbr (e.g., ⟨ŵ⟩). For symbols, use template:char (e.g., @). Do not hyperlink the symbol because hypertext underlining may confuse what is being shown: link its description instead (e.g., underscore, _ not [[_]]).

Do we need to address CJK, Arabic and South Asian scripts explicitly? I don't believe that the same issue arises, so I think not. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 11:41, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Diacritics[edit]

Hooke[edit]

Madame la Marquise[edit]

see user:JMF/Chastelet

Ball cites Stephen Peter Rigaud for the attribution to Clairaut, citing Historical Essay on the first publication of Sir Isaac Newton's Principia, p. 66

The Birth of a New Physics[edit]

  • "When Newton declined to credit authors who tossed off general statements without being able to prove them mathematically or fit them into a valid framework of dynamics, he was quite justified in saying, as he did of Hooke's claims: "Now is not this very fine? Mathematicians that find out, settle, and do all the business must content themselves with being nothing but dry calculators and drudges; and another, that does nothing but pretend and grasp at all things, must carry away all the invention, as well of those that were to follow him as of those that went before".[1]
  • In any event, by January 1684 Halley had concluded that the force acting on planets to keep them in their orbits "decreased in the proportion of the squares of the distances reciprocally"[1]
  • "Newton's" First Law: first stated by Descartes and printed postumously in his Principles of Philosophy" 1644.[2]
  • "Newton was therefore correct in his judgment that Hooke did not really understand the consequences of his guess that the attractive force varies as the inverse square of the distance and that he did not therefore deserve credit for the law of Universal gravity. This would have seemed all the more true in that Newton was aware that he did not need Hooke to suggest to him the inverse-square character of the force. Hooke's claim to the in- verse-square law has masked Newton's far more fundamental debt to him, the analysis of curvilinear orbital motion. In asking for too much credit, Hooke effectively denied to himself the credit due him for a seminal idea".[3]

Meteorology[edit]

"Hooke was our first meteorologist" 'Espinasse, p 50 https://archive.org/details/roberthooke0000marg/page/50/mode/2up?view=theater

Vivisection[edit]

"I shall hardly be induced to make further trials of this kind, because of the torture of the creature" (Hooke to Boyle, 10 November 1664, cited in 'Espinasse, p 52)


References

  1. ^ a b Cohen (1985), p. 150.
  2. ^ Cohen (1985), p. 153.
  3. ^ Cohen (1985), p. 221.

Harv problems[edit]

Cunningham, Michel; Roberts, Alan; Barbee, Anita P.; Druen, Perri; Wu, Cheng-Huan (1995). ""Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 68 (2): 261–79. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.261.

ref=CITEREFCunningham1995 works!