Talk:Urii Eliseev

Chess Low‑importance

	Chess portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group.

Russia Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Propose name change[edit]

While a Google search says different, I am far more used to the spelling Urii Eliseev. I propose a name change to that. Jkmaskell (talk) 18:46, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have no objections. I went with what most of the sources said, but after I'd created the article I noticed that FIDE have Urii Eliseev - that seems to be the preferred transliteration in the chess world.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 19:50, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree too that the article should be renamed "Urii Eliseev". -- Sophia91 (talk) 14:07, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be consensus so I will make the move.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 15:15, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]