Talk:Surp Krikor Lusavoriç Armenian Church, Kuzguncuk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 07:26, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that students and adults of three different religions visited the Armenian Church in Kuzguncuk, Istanbul, as part of a social activity organized by the local women residents of these religions? Source: "12 Şubat 2008 tarihinde Kuzguncuk'da yaşayan üç dine mensup hanımlar tarafından düzenlenen, üç dine mensup insanların Kuzguncuk'ta bir arada kardeşçe sevgi içinde bir arada yaşamalarını konu alan etkinlik dahilinde bu dinlere mensup öğrenci ve büyükler cami ziyaretinden sonra, kilisemizi ziyaret ettiler." (in Turkish) [1]

Created by CeeGee (talk). Self-nominated at 10:18, 18 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Interesting church, on good sources, Turkish sourcs accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. The hook is a bit lengthy for my taste but fine. I have a few questions regarding the article. The map gives me not much, and displaces the next image. I'd prefer the history in chronological order. I'm not happy with the header "Visiting" for a mix of background (which could go to the very beginning of the article, same about the sentence in "School" about the growing congregation), parish life and visiting. Finally, I can imagine that the article name would also be unique without the location which few readers will know anyway, so could be shorter, and better move before DYK day than someone else does it in the middle of that day. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:35, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you very much for your review. The title includes the location because I intend shortly to create another article of the same church name. I will respond to your remaining comments soon. CeeGee 13:40, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Gerda Arendt: It is common to have location maps in infoboxes. The image below the map is not displaced at all for my opinion. The history section is certainly in chronological order. Maybe the subordinate clause of the sentence caused confusion. I find the section of the "Visiting" okay. However, I'd appreciate any better section title to replace "Visiting". The "School" section needs also to be separate because it is affiliated with the church but it is an educational building and not a worship place. Anyway, your comments are always welcome. CeeGee 11:41, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    That's all right. Editors have different styles, and no problem. I'd split the first sentence in history, mentioning first what came first, but up to you. Same about the map. Common or not, I rely on the related location article for a map, but up to you. This hook was approved anyway, and article suggestions are exactly that, - suggestions. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:09, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The "History" section is copyedited now for chronological order. The location map in the infobox marks the exact place of the church.CeeGee 10:40, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]