Talk:Shlomo Ganzfried

Judaism High‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Shulchan arukh vs Shulchan aruch[edit]

Shulchan Aruch may get more hits than Shulkhan arukh, but Shulchan Arukh beats both(keeping in mind that chet and khaf are different letters) . —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.72.215.131 (talk) 23:57, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Old discussion[edit]

It is odd that Kitzur Shulkhan Arukh links directly to R' Shlomo Ganzfried. There should be a disambiguation page, since, in fact, there are two books by the name Kitzur Shulkhan Arukh--one by R' Ganzfried and one by R' Toledano. The former's Kitzur has gained a greater readership, it seems, in the Ashkenazic communities than the latter's homonymous work in the Sepharadic communities.

Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to…) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome.. JFW | T@lk 09:07, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kitzur Shulchan Aruch[edit]

Since all common translations etc. write 'ch' instead of 'kh', I edited this. Let's use Google to check: "Kitzur Shulkhan Arukh" gets 626 hits, "Kitzur Shulchan Aruch" gets 32,600. That's about 50 times more. All translations, both online and in book form, write 'ch'. I assume that nobody objects. --Daniel575 02:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I HAVE A PICTURE[edit]

I HAVE A PICTURE OF THE RABBI - HOW DO I POST IT?

EVINITSKY@YAHOO.COM

Heradi?[edit]

It says he's a heradi posek. Isn't that a bit anachronistic? 88.152.2.248 14:27, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seforim[edit]

I added Seforim to the list of his works. They come from the title page of Sefer Apiryon, published by R' Ganzfried himself. 138.89.85.229 (talk) 05:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Shlomo Ganzfried. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Shlomo Ganzfried. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:18, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]