Talk:Romantic art
Contested deletion[edit]
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the source is most likely a mirror. This is a mostly word-for-word split of content from Romanticism. --Erroramong (talk) 01:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio false alarm[edit]
The copyvio detector flags two sites:
- https://www.historyofcreativity.com/mid20/romanticism--romantic - this one is easy, as it explicitly says, "Content provided by Wikipedia"
- https://658046236438008177.weebly.com/romantic-visual-arts.html was created on 2 November 2015 (per WayBackMachine). Our text was in pretty much the same shape available as part of the Romanticism for much longer (WikBlame currently does not work, but the sentences flagged certainly predate 2015).
Thus, both hits are false alarms, ignore them. Викидим (talk) 06:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)