Talk:Ortal, Golan Heights

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Project Israel To Do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate the Unassessed Israel-related articles and Unknown-importance Israel-related articles.
Categorization : Diffuse articles from Category:Companies of Israel.
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category and the tool's wiki page.
Collaborate : Participate in WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration.
Copyedit : Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2005
Deletion sorting : Participate in discussions at WikiProject Deletion sorting/Israel.
Expand : Ayala Procaccia, Diamond industry in Israel, Edna Arbel, Levin Kipnis, Rami Kleinstein, Sephardic Haredim, Zman Tel Aviv, Nachum Heiman, Public Defence (Israel), Prisoner of Zion, Trial of Benjamin Netanyahu, Day to Mark the Departure and Expulsion of Jews from the Arab Countries and Iran, Pre-Modern Aliyah
See also Articles needing translation from Hebrew Wikipedia.
Geographical coordinates : Add geographic coordinates to Israel articles missing geocoordinate data.
Infobox : Add infoboxes to Israel articles needing infoboxes.
Maintain : See Israel articles needing attention.
Map : See discussion at Module:Location map/data/Israel. Add maps to articles in Wikipedia requested maps in Israel.
NPOV : Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries
Photo : Add pictures to articles in Wikipedia requested photographs in Israel.
Stubs : See Israel stubs.
Update : Basic Law proposal: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People
Other :
- Translate to Hebrew : David Bar-Hayim, Guy Bavli, and Guy Oseary.
- Merge Nahal Rafiah (draft, heb) into Nahal as requested by Wikipedia authority

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Terms[edit]

Settlement was before kibbutz on June 15. Thats what it is called by the entire world. Get consensus if you want to change the position. [1] --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 22:33, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok dude. Thank you for letting me use your argument when I apply it the other way around. Cheers. --Shuki (talk) 09:53, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So I went back in the history and found that the term kibbutz existed before you inserted the settlement label on 3 August 2009. [2] so in other words,

Settlement was before kibbutz on 3 August 2009. Get consensus if you want to change the position. Cheers. --Shuki (talk) 10:00, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No because "settlement" wasn't even in the article before august 3. So how could "kibbutz" have been "before" it? I don't see any consensus here for you rearranging and putting the term used by the entire world after "kibbutz". --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 10:05, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know you are aware that an RfC is going on now, and that the status quo should be kept until consensus is reached. We should refrain from edit warring on this, there are over 200 other geography articles like this one. At this time, I am not going to the other articles to rv back to before your POV edits last year, I suggest you also take a step back. --Shuki (talk) 12:33, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The "status quo" at this article was "settlement" before "kibbutz", at no previous time was the "kibbutz" before "settlement", you have no consensus for your pov rearranging. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 12:51, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shuki, SD is right. Settlement has been before kibbutz before another user changed that. Accordingly, I will be placing settlement first here. I agree that while the RFC is being held we should maintain the status quo, but here the original order was settlement then kibbutz. nableezy - 15:00, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose you reread my comment and saw for yourself that until 3 August 2009, there was no settlement before kibbutz. --Shuki (talk) 19:17, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but if we are operating under that standard perhaps we should go through each of the articles that originally only had settlement until you added town first and reverse the order. Just kidding of course, I am willing to see where the RFC leads us and do nothing in the meantime. nableezy - 22:15, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That would be fun but interesting at the same time. We start with almost all the Golan articles? On the other hand, two people on the RfC have voted opposite to how they started some/many articles. --Shuki (talk) 20:56, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shuki, you said "Settlement was before kibbutz on 3 August 2009", still you haven't provided the diff to show me at what time exactly the "kibbutz" was before "settlement", if you cant show this, I guess it has be be reverted back to the status quo. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 17:57, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I need to do your work? Go check the first version of the article. There is no mention of settlement. It was only later put in by you over a year later. --Shuki (talk) 21:29, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am looking at the first version of the article:[3], and I don't see that the kibbutz was before settlement, because "settlement" wasn't in the article, so it couldn't have been before "kibbutz". At no previous time was the "kibbutz" before "settlement". So your claims for the rearrangement is inaccurate, I am therefor changing back to the original status quo. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 18:26, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's a weenie argument. What does that mean 'original status quo'? Pre RfC or post RfC? Pre-Nableezy or post-Nableezy? --Shuki (talk) 18:35, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Original status quo is how the position of these two terms was from the beginning. The argument is that at no previous time was the "kibutz" before "settlement". The earliest time these two terms appeared together here, "settlement" was before "kibbutz". --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 18:42, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Out of curiosity Shuki, are you saying that if the original version of the article had only contained settlement and somebody had added "village" ahead of settlement we should go change it so that "settlement" is before "village"? nableezy - 21:38, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Status sentence[edit]

There has been long discussion at WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration/Current Article Issues about adding the illegality issue in all settlement article:[4] There is now consensus to have the sentence: "The international community considers Israeli settlements in (the Golan Heights/the West Bank/East Jerusalem) illegal under international law, but the Israeli government disputes this." in all relevant articles, but its not clear yet exactly where in the article, so therefor I'm suggesting that the agreed upon sentence be placed as the third sentence in this article. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 23:46, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you keep it to the centralized discussion instead of copy-pasting over a potential 200+ talk pages. --Shuki (talk) 23:57, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 20:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]