Talk:Ontario Highway 418

Ontario Highway 418 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Ontario Highway 418 is part of the 400-series highways series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 21, 2016	Peer review	Reviewed
September 21, 2016	Good topic candidate	Promoted
April 10, 2020	Peer review	Reviewed
April 11, 2020	Good article nominee	Listed
Current status: Good article

Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

Canada Roads: Ontario High‑importance

This article is part of the Canada Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in Canadian provinces, territories and counties. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Canada RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Canada RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Canada RoadsCanada road transport articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics:
/
	Ontario

This article has a KML file.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ontario Highway 418/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk · contribs) 18:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

This was probably the easiest article to review since the issues were addressed in the peer review. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 18:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

Reference #7 should have the date of publication (March 6, 2007)
- Done Username⁶⁸⁹² 19:02, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Easy pass. Congrats! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 19:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]