This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontanaWikipedia:WikiProject MontanaTemplate:WikiProject MontanaMontana articles
A particular Wikipedian is censoring information about this topic by misrepresenting an inline citation as an external link. The reference is necessary because a casual reader will not know what the NF is by itself.47.137.185.148 (talk) 18:57, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Refspam is still spam, and the Northwest Front's website is absolutely not reliable. It's a single anonymous hate group which doesn't have any official connection to this topic, and is not in any way a reliable source for statements of fact. Calling this "censorship" implies that you have some sort of right to spam you club. You do not. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion. Grayfell (talk) 19:47, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Greyfell - That is interesting. Calling the Northwest Front a "hate group" is subjective at best, and for the purposes of editing Wikipedia, NPOV at worst. That may be your WP:POINT, but it is beside mine. What organization has any official connection to the topic? The SPLC? Are they a hate group as well? 47.137.185.72 (talk) 20:47, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This language is incorrect as it implies they working toward a greater good for society. This initiative more aligns with terrorist ideology. 2601:500:8900:7C80:69D2:39C4:7CF4:5809 (talk) 22:43, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]