Talk:National Shrine of Saint Jude (England)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Photo[edit]

Untitled[edit]

On flickr is this photo (of the (Shrine), have no idea how to convert it into a wiki image. http://www.flickr.com/photos/41621108@N00/7788320306/ or what are the rules. DavidAnstiss (talk) 18:35, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The image that you point to is in copyright, so we cannot upload it to Commons, sorry. Storye book (talk) 21:39, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Shrine of Saint Jude (England). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising brochure?[edit]

As it stands, it appears to have been written as a promotion of a religious site, or at best, as a tourist guide. It does not seem to accord with the objectives of Wikipedia. In that case why has it been evaluated as a class B? The information and sources it contains makes it closer to a stub class article. Po Mieczu (talk) 20:41, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]