Talk:Middle East Policy Council

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Western Asia Low‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

What is necessarily conservative about this organization?

Have you read the list of members? Famousdog 13:15, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Mainly obscure people. Some Republicans and Democrats too. I 'm not saying this organization isn't conservative, just that there isn't proof for it being so. I don't think this falls on the right left spectrum, as its focus is mainly American Arab relations.

Hmmm. I'd argue that the Democrat-Republican axis is Right-Further Right, not Left-Right, but lets look at their occupations:

Defense
Defense
Oil
Defense
Defense
Spying
Some Senator
Finance

That's a pretty Tory line-up right there! But you're right. There's no explicit proof of agenda, so this is all supposition. If you don't like the label "conservative" by all means remove it or applying a label that you're happy with. And please sign your comments! Famousdog 13:37, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where does their funding come from? I read somewhere that the bulk of the organization's funding comes from Saudi Arabia. Is that true? Pburman505 (talk) 15:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging - October 2016[edit]

This article has been heavily sanitized and much information from reliable sources critical of MEPC's agenda successively removed and replaced with references to it's own website. I'm going to start deleting this (mainly promotional and POV) material soon unless reliable, independent sources are included. Famous _dog (c) 07:39, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Middle East Policy Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081129031229/http://www.mepc.org///resources/bahgat.asp to http://www.mepc.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:56, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]