Talk:La Grange Historic District (North Carolina)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:La Grange Historic District (North Carolina)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: APK (talk · contribs) 09:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: 48JCL (talk · contribs) 00:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Hello! I am excited to review this article.

It is reasonably well written.

  • a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
  • b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  • a (reference section): I’m sorry, but the CN tag is an issue for a GAN.
Great! That’s a pass. 48JCL (talkcontribs) 16:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • b (citations to reliable sources): sources are reliable! Gov websites are working.
  • c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): This was so tedious to do but thats a pass

It is broad in its coverage.

  • a (major aspects): Contains major aspects.
  • b (focused): doesn’t really focus on minor aspects. So pass!

It follows the neutral point of view policy. Nice job! This article strives for the neutral point of view policy.

  • Fair representation without bias:

It is stable.

  • No edit wars, etc.: Pretty easy pass. Very few authors.

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

  • a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): Yep, images are tagged, that’s a pass
  • b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Captions are fine, however, when you say, 130 South Caswell Stret is one of many commercial buildings in need of repair, do you mean street?

Recommend alt text. @APK

Overall: Pass/Fail:

Source Check[edit]

Forgot to add this! Pretty short article, took like 30 minutes. Passing!

Final comments[edit]

PASSING! But please add alt text lol @APK