Talk:Hostilian/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 20:03, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have done some minor copy editing. Could you check that you are ok with it? Gog the Mild (talk) 18:17, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Gog the Mild: I am perfectly fine with your edits; apologies for the delay, was on a fishing trip and forgot to leave notice. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 03:24, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Iazyges: Not a problem. I only sent the nudge when you habn't responded after 3 days. I hadn't pinged toy and thought that you may have missed it on your watchlist. I hope that the fishing was good.

A very fine short article. About all that can be said on the topic is said: well, succinctly and sourced. Good job. Gog the Mild (talk) 09:12, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed