This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess articles
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 07:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia generally discourages the use of such sections. Specifically with this article, the "controversy" is given disproportionate significance within the article and the text itself isn't written in a neutral way. As I explained when I removed this section, this was a minor controversy that will be forgotten in a year's time. I fully understand why this has been added but I cannot agree with it. How do other editors feel on the issue of such sections? Jkmaskell (talk) 20:57, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe rewrite it to be more neutral? There isn't really a way to be more "neutral" without being overly apologetic for him though. Inarkiev's behavior was completely unsportsmanlike and borderline attempted cheating. It caused a significant outcry in the chess community, chess legends like Kasparov made posts calling it a disgrace, and the subreddits and forums are still making Inarkiev memes. This will probably continue to taint his name for a long time to come. So when his name is talked about in disdain, it may be useful for someone looking him up to know why that is. 47.37.166.88 (talk) 02:25, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've gone through the section to fix the major issues like the title, use of the word "steal" and clarify the events. Reddit/Chess has 44th the latest mention of it. Only a few controversies genuinely deserve a section, like Topalov/Kramnik. The rest, its trivia, which only serves to make the subject look bad and unbalances the article. Wikipedia is not Google. Jkmaskell (talk) 23:22, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a sort of an open blog, it must be based on reliable sources, not on Reddit or other forums which are heavily biased. I agree with User:Jkmaskell, I think the Kramnik-Topalov is the only controversy worth to be covered. Nakamura also had an unsportsmanlike behaviour in the Candidates 2016, a much more important tournament than the world rapid and blitz, but it's not mentioned at all in his entry. This is just another example of the systemic bias of the English Wikipedia. I think the whole section should be just removed. Sophia91 (talk) 04:44, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
