Talk:Cyclone Nadia

Cyclone Nadia has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Cyclone Nadia is part of the 1993–94 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 26, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
August 1, 2013	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Weather: Tropical / Southern Hemisphere Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Southern Hemisphere work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclone Nadia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 03:58, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

"The Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) estimated winds of about 220 km/h (140 mph (1–minute sustained))." seems a bit boring and bland maybe a Meanwhile, before that sentence would be good IMO. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 03:58, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Added "In contrast". --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't the article use DMY dates since it is outside of the NHC basins perWP:MOS? YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 03:58, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No, WP:MOSDATE says it's fine to do it either way. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Damage was heaviest in Mozambique, estimated at about $20 million (1994 USD)." is it me or is the word "the" missing? YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 03:58, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it's you, I don't see anything missing. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yea, I made a grammar mistake here. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 18:08, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
", notably the cashew crop." what is a cashew crop? YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane
- It's a cashew. I think it was a common enough word. Do you think it should be linked? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 18:08, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - I really think cashews are common enough, but fine, I'll link. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You use "caused" a lot in the lead, try other stuff like "was blamed for" "was responsible" "resulted in" "brought" ect, Don't worry, I have this problem too. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 03:58, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Removed one. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
" primarily Nampula Province where it moved ashore." second part is redundant since you mentioned the landfall earlier. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 03:58, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Not really, since I didn't mention where the landfall location was earlier. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meteorological history[edit]

" On March 17, the JTWC also began tracking the system on March 17.[2]" Lol, you used "March 17" twice. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 03:58, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Oops! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"That day, the JTWC estimated winds of 120 km/h (75 mph (1–minute sustained)), or the equivalent of a minimal hurricane,[2] and late on March 21, MF upgraded Nadia into an intense tropical cyclone.[1]" what categories. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 03:58, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- What do you mean what category? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Like what categories was it on the SSHS, for example
    - How is that relevant? Neither MF nor JTWC use the SSHS. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"That day, the JTWC estimated winds of 120 km/h (75 mph (1–minute sustained)), or the equivalent of a minimal hurricane,[2] and late on March 21, MF upgraded Nadia into an intense tropical cyclone.[1]" I'd wikilink to their scales. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 03:58, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Linked to ITC. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"t about 0100 UTC on March 23, Nadia made landfall on northern Madagascar near Vohemar, having weakened slightly from its peak.[1]" what was it's landfall intensity. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 03:58, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- MF didn't include the landfall point in its BT. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:OVERLINKING, you should wikilnk terms one in the article or once in the lead, body, infobox, ect. Right now, there's inconsistency.
- Which terms, in particular? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - JTWC, MF, and USD. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 18:08, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - They're all linked only once though. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"[3] The storm strengthened to reach a secondary peak intensity of 85 km/h (50 mph (10 minute sustained)" there seems to be a } missing after sustained, there is one, but shouln't there be 2 due to double parenthesis. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:06, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Should be consistent now. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"and the circulation dissipated a day later.[3][1]" where? YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:06, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Nowhere notable. I mentioned where it was in the previous sentence. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Impact and aftermath[edit]

Any preps? YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:06, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Couldn't find any. Google news didn't help. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Daw. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 18:08, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"At the port in Nacala, two ships sank and the local harbor was wrecked;[8] one of the damaged ships spilled oil into the Bay of Nacala.[10] " the fourth part should be moved two after "two ships sank" part IMO. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I think I got what you mean. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"After the storm, about 300,000 people in Nampula Province in Mozambique required food and other goods." optional, this is GAN, not FAC after all, but to have more variety, change "about" to "roughly" and "people" to "residents". YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, changed one of the "about"s. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"damage to sanitation facilities," wtf is that? YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- A facility that deals with sanitation? It's like a sewage treatment plant, garbage center, whatnot. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"The French government sent $48,000 worth of medicine, blankets, and food, the United Kingdom sent $373,134 for generators, water tanks, and roofing materials, and the Spanish government sent about $117,000 worth of food and tents" 1994 or 2012 USD? YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Isn't it clear, given how the rest of the article is in 1994 USD? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"In June 1994, the World Bank provided $20 million in assistance to the country due to the storm.[14] Cyclone Nadia contributed to fishing exports decreasing by $11 million during the year.[15]" see above. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Wikilink JTWC, MF on first term to be consistent for most of the rest of article where you wikilink landfall in both the lead and the body for example. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- K. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - You did not wikilink MF on the refs, and you still did not link the United Press International for example on first usage of the refs. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 18:08, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Regarding MF, yea I did, ref 1. I added UPI, but you never said to do that. I removed the second landfall link. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ref 2 does not look like it's in cite report. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Does that look any different? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - There seems to be a (report) thingy on ref 3 but not ref 2 for example. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 18:08, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Date for ref 2 (it should say n the 1994 BT page). YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It says it was last modified in January of this year, but that isn't when it was made. That's why I left it out. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Publisher, accessdate for Ref 5. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Added. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Publisher for ref 9. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane
- There is none. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Season button bar seems to be missing (if there is one). YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- There is none. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Daw. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 18:08, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Summary[edit]

I was a bit picky here. There seems to be some problems, but all should be easy to fix. Of course, it is on hold. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Passing. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 22:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cyclone Nadia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131113232608/http://desastres.usac.edu.gt/documentos/pdf/eng/doc12611/doc12611-b3.pdf to http://desastres.usac.edu.gt/documentos/pdf/eng/doc12611/doc12611-b3.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:31, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]