Talk:Colossal statue of Shapur I

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sculpture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

This article needs a rewrite; it's style in unencyclopaedic and well.. just odd. Reminds me of a tour guide who's describing the monument as if the reader is standing directly before it. Sentences are simplistic, occasionally pedantic, tenses are in the present, and I hate to say it... but it sounds almost juvenile.

Maybe you're right what you say, you loud-mouth, but you know, just the sissies have no guts to validate their faulty assumptions by a signature --Wiki-in-basel (talk) 13:08, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The reigning years of Shapur I are (AD 240-272). Please don`t change it. --Wiki-in-basel (talk) 10:23, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Translated?[edit]

Is this article translated from Persian? If so, it should have the translated tag at the top. If not, than this article is so far below the standards of Wikipedia it should sooner be nominated for deletion than trying to fix it. "About 1400 years ago" is not acceptable for dating, I'm not sure about the official rules of Wikipedia however specific years or estimations are always used in well-established articles. The biggest problem this article has however is the astonishing lack of sources. It's very clear that the entire article has been written by one user with a lot of personal opinion, which is not how this website works. Going to give benefit of the doubt here and assume it's just a translation thing though. —bernoullis principle Bernoullis principle (talk) 14:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from wrong (redirect) page. Johnbod (talk) 16:15, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to have been mostly written by a German-speaker - see the history, and the original sources. But many others, including me, have touched it up. Do you really think we are likely to have anything like a precise date for when part of a statue in a rather remote cave collapsed "About 1400 years ago"? It needs more inline refs certainly, but several academic sources (in German) are given. Johnbod (talk) 16:18, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]