Talk:Circle Tower

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (Okay, so I'll admit that I made a few mistakes that I won't ever do again. I was really sleep deprived when I did these revisions, and now that I'm awake, I see what went wrong. That being said, I do not think Circle Tower should be removed outright given its significance to Indianapolis' past and its listing on the national register of historic places.) --Indiana6724 (talk) 12:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: I hope you develop the article. I find that there are sources available so I am marking this as reviewed.

Bruxton (talk) 14:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

Circle Tower
Circle Tower
  • ... that the Circle Tower (pictured) in Indianapolis, Indiana is an Art Deco building which features ziggurat-like upper floors?
Created by Indiana6724 (talk) and Bruxton (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 147 past nominations.

Bruxton (talk) 21:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is long enough, created within the window and generally in a good place. QPQ is done (I assume the one is good, even though there are two nominators). Images are all appropriately licensed and I can find no evidence of other plagiarism, copyvio or BLP issues. Would suggest linking art deco and ziggurat in the appropriate hooks, and "art-deco style" needs a hyphen in ALT2. Our own article also capitalises Art Deco, as does the main page for this one: would suggest doing so in the hooks. UndercoverClassicist T·C 06:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@UndercoverClassicist: Thank you for reviewing! I have capitalized Art Deco and went without hyphens. I am going to skep adding extra links to the hooks. We have had discussions at WT:DYK about just having the article link. I also think readers will click and learn about these. Bruxton (talk) 05:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Happy to Approve on that basis. Can't immediately find that discussion, but I don't think links in the hook are a make-or-break issue: if the promoter feels strongly enough about establishing a consistent style within the set, they can always adjust them. UndercoverClassicist T·C 06:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]