Talk:Car colour popularity

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Re-Run the Survey[edit]

I don't know if anyone would be interested but it seems like it would be easy to put out a global poll on the internet and get proper data for more than one country, it's something that could be done with a google form, or survey monkey, or many other services. I'm not sure how reliable the data would be or how useful that data actually is, but I much prefer having more data than less. --Zenware (talk) 13:17, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Automotive Design[edit]

I don't believe that car colour popularity has anything to do with automotive design, the issue is one of consumer choice and fashion, not one of design. In the interests of de-orphaning the article how about merging it with fashion or fads and trends? Dino246 15:55, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How about merging it with car classification? Jay (talk) 03:27, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valid Article?[edit]

Given that the info is only for one year and one country and the referenced webpage is no longer available should this article be deleted? --User:Boreas74 ^Talk 16:57, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd certainly vote to delete it.Dino246 (talk) 13:56, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of Citations?[edit]

Similar to the above section, I put a citations needed template and it was reverted - Any good reason why? There are paragraphs and paragraphs of wild and reckless claims (as far as car colour popularity can be reckless) that are lacking any reference in the linked citations, or at least mad claims cited by only one opinionated article. Am I wrong in this view? --Sgtlion (talk) 15:25, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Car colour popularity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080417204221/http://biz.yahoo.com:80/brn/070914/22589.html?.v=1&.pf=family-home to http://biz.yahoo.com/brn/070914/22589.html?.v=1&.pf=family-home

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:31, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]