Talk:Aurelius Valerius Symmachus Tullianus

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I do not understand the request for sources. --TakenakaN (talk) 21:55, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tullianus Symmachus or Symmachus Tullianus?[edit]

The form given of this consul's name is surprising. Alan Cameron (in "The Antiquity of the Symmachi", Historia, 48 (1999), pp. 477-505) calls him Symmachus Tullianus, explaining that Tullianus is an agnomen & Symmachus the cognomen; but here is it placed as if a cognomen & Symmachus is the agnomen, which would be odd because his descendants for the next 150+ years use Symmachus as the family name. And on what grounds is this man known as "Marcus Aurelius Valerius Tullianus Symmachus Phosphorius"? Methinks a troll has been messing with this article. -- llywrch (talk) 22:04, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I read a little further into Cameron's paper mentioned above, & he offers the possibility that Symmachus Tullianus had the nickname "Phosphorius". But it still was a shock to find it included with no citation or source. -- llywrch (talk) 22:59, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]