Talk:Arthington Priory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Photo request[edit]

Although I have added an image showing the hall which was built on the site, I have not removed the photo request in the hope that an old archive drawing or map of the site may be found. We still have no picture of Arthington Priory itself.--Storye book (talk) 20:07, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have now removed the photo request because there appears to be no surviving drawing of the original priory as it was before the Dissolution of the Monasteries. There is no such image at Leeds Library local studies department, although there still may be a drawing (perhaps on an old map?) at West Yorkshire Archive Service.--Storye book (talk) 15:49, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Putative pictures of the nunnery building[edit]

This page on the Leodis site contains links to archive pictures said to be of the nunnery building. It looks like a weaver's establishment to me, but I'd be interested to see your comments. --Storye book (talk) 20:27, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Update: The following information is in Harry Speight, "Lower Wharfedale" (Elliot Stock, London 1902). A copy of the book is held in the Local History library at Leeds, West Yorkshire. It appears that the house called the Nunnery (see my link to Leodis above) was very likely built on the foundations and lower courses of the Priory church, and that the farm buildings associated with this house were probably built over the convent buildings. Arthington Hall is apparently on the site of the Priory's attached land. However Speight appears to think that this information is likely but not definite, and it would be interesting to know what the local archaeological society has to say on this matter (Leeds archaeological societies links). It is certainly true to say that the article wrongly conflates Arthington Hall and the house called the Nunnery.--Storye book (talk) 15:50, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have now updated the article to take in the above information. --Storye book (talk) 15:49, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Old money"[edit]

I had put back an edit done by someone else because I didn't know what the command "nowrap" does. It didn't seem to do much of anything to my eye. Did I miss something? Daniel the Monk (talk) 16:26, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The "nowrap" template is used to make sure that the text inside appears all on one line; it won't be obvious unless the text appears at the end or start of a line. I think the idea is that splitting up £11 8s could be confusing. In the example you gave I don't think it's particularly likely but I think it is encouraged to use the template as it has a similar function to non-breaking spaces (which are covered in the Manual of Style). I wouldn't lose any sleep over the template to be honest, most people won't notice the difference. Nev1 (talk) 16:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, okay, thanks! I can see why the original editor used it, given three elements to the sums. Going back to sleep now. ;-) Daniel the Monk (talk) 16:52, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Arthington Priory/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.
  1. Requires infobox
  2. Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
  3. Requires copy edit for WP:MOS
Keith D (talk) 23:27, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 23:27, 13 April 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 08:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arthington Priory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:50, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]